Characteristics of Research
Characteristics
of a Good Research:
Whatever may be the
types of research works and studies, they all meet on the common
characteristics of scientific method. Thus, one could expect the following
criteria or characteristics in a good research.
1.
The purpose of research should be
clearly defined and common concepts are used.
2.
The research procedure used should
explicitly be described to permit other researchers to repeat the research for
further advancement and to keep the continuity of what has already been attained.
3.
The procedural design of research should
be carefully planned to estimate their effects upon finding or to yield results
that are objective as possible.
4.
The analysis of data should be
sufficiency adequate to reveal its significance and the methods of analysis
used should be appropriate.
5.
The reliability and validity of the data
should be checked carefully.
6.
Conclusions should be confined,
justified by the data should be checked carefully.
7.
Conclusions should be confined,
justified by the data of the research and be limited to those for which it can
provide with an adequate basis.
8.
Greater confidence in research is
warranted if the researcher is experienced, has a good reputation in research
and is a person of integrity.
In spite of above
necessities, a good research should possess the following four qualities.
1. Systematic :
The
term systematic implies that the research is structured with specific steps to
be taken in a specified sequence in accordance with well defined set of rules.
In other words, the research contents of different topics conducted at
different point of time and places d not vary considerably. However, this
assumption is not valid even within a particular region practically. For example,
the research work performed by two academicians in a common topic at two
different places may not necessarily appear same in terms of format and
contents. Systematic characteristic of the research does not rule out creative
thinking but it certainly does reject the use of guessing and intuition in arriving
at conclusions.
2. Logical :
The
research is guided by the rules of logical reasoning. The logical process of
induction and deductions are great value in carrying out research. Induction is
the process of reasoning from a part to the whole. Inductive method begins with
a collection and study of facts and draws conclusion through a posteriori
reasoning while deductive or abstract method presupposes certain conclusions
and applies them to facts through a prior reasoning. In other words, in
deduction, we deduce generalization from universal to particular but in
induction we arrive at universal generalizations form particular facts.
Further, in deduction the conclusion only seeks to unfold what is in the
premises. It does not go beyond premises i.e. the conclusion is never more
general than the premised while in induction the conclusion goes beyond the
premises.
In fact, logical reasoning makes a research more meaningful in context of decision making. Also the deductive method gives us conclusions, which are certain, but the conclusions of inductive method are only probable and not always certain. If we say that all men are mortal and Hari is a man, therefore Hari is mortal. This is an example of deductive method and it is certain. But if we say that some educated girls have expensive habits, therefore all educated girls have expensive habits. It is an example of inductive method and is not true at all.
3. Empirical :
An
empirical characteristic implies that research is related basically to one or
more aspects of a real situation and deals with concrete data that provides a
basis for external validity to research results. An empirical characteristic
assumes that the research result of the similar topic conducted at different
times within a particular or different places are consistent and
predictable. However, in practice, it is
not possible to get consistent results form a series of research studies
conducted within a common topic and place even at the same time. This
assumption is valid only for experimental research but not for social and
business research areas.
4. Replicable :
This
characteristic allows research results to be verified by repeating the study
and thereby building a sound basis for decision. In other words, replicating the research
activity in the same topic form common sample (or universe) results consistent
agreement at least between some studies. This characteristics stress to the
repeated work in the common topic for valid and consistent result.
Comments